Originally, scientists thought that intelligent life should be somewhat common in the universe. All one had to do was to estimate the number of planets in the habitable zones of their stars in our galaxy, and there were an unlimited number of candidates. The prebiotic molecules that help kick-start life can be found throughout the universe. So life made up of single cells is probably common on many planets.
Part I of this series covered the Obstacles to intelligent life based on sun type, planet formation, and simple cell biology. There we learned that unless eukaryotes developed, no intelligent life was possible. Assuming, however, that eukaryotes do appear, we now discuss what further obstacles to intelligent life are present after complex multicellular lifeforms evolve.
Animals that have reached a human level of intelligence, and able to extensively manipulate their environment, have only been certain primates. Living in trees, they first used their legs to walk upright on tree branches while holding on to higher tree branches with their arms, then walked on the ground with their arms free to carry provisions. No other animal form on Earth has reached human intelligence capabilities.
It was very unlikely that the asteroid that struck the Earth and led to the dinosaur's demise would land where it did. Half of the Earth's surface is deep water where an asteroid strike would not have much significance. So the evolution of primates on Earth was a fluke caused by an asteroid landing in the worst possible place to cause mass extinction of large animals.
The primate genus homo, which appeared 2.8 million years ago, happened 4.3 billion years after the Earth first formed. It took a long time to get that far, and there was no guarantee it would happen. What we have to conclude is that another Obstacle to the development of a technologically intelligent species is the absence of primate-like animals.
Most of human history is that of bands of roaming foragers living off the land. When human populations grew too dense to sustain themselves foraging food in the wild, farming and a more settled way of life in villages appeared. However, Neanderthals and Denisovans never produced growing populations that required settlements and farming. If a species like modern humans with its rapid population growth does not appear, permanent settlements with the motivation to develop a writing system and recorded information may never develop.
The first modern human philosophy explaining how the world came about was religion. Religion is not only widespread in all human cultures, it is easy to understand by the simplest of men. It tends to lead away from a rational, logical approach to the world to one that is more subjective. It is also very effective in combating other philosophies, such as science, and will often drive them out of society, by killing, or banishment of, its advocates.
Science is the methodical study of the observable universe for the purpose of understanding the laws by which the universe is governed. This philosophy was developed in Greece over many centuries and culminated in the teachings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle. Greece was the only country in the world to develop science and pass it to others. Without the Greek philosophical approach, would science have been invented and accepted by society anywhere else?
Science had to go through a gauntlet of challenges before gaining widespread acceptance. It developed slowly in the Roman empire, but the Islamic conquest took over the southern Mediterranean and with it, much of the literature of the Roman world. Some forward-thinking sultans paid for the development of scholarly knowledge after the conquest. Based on Greco-Roman literature, the Islamic world developed scientific methodology, optics, and algebra. Then money dried up because of wars with invading barbarians, and Islamic leaders declared that religion had been perfected and no further development of knowledge was needed.
An entire library of Islamic literature in Toledo, Spain, was gifted to the Spanish who translated it to Latin. Science then began further development in the Christian world until it was effectively banned by the Catholic church. Ironically, it was banned because Galileo's teachings disagreed with those of Aristotle, whom the Church had adopted as the ultimate scientific authority, even though frequently wrong and out of date.
Some scientists fled to Protestant countries where the Pope had little influence. There, they continued to develop science, picking up the Protestant religious idea that one should do honest work to be worthy. Science flourished in Protestant countries, giving us physics, chemistry, and biology, which eventually led to electric power, radio communications, and solid-state electronics.
Science could have been abandoned if Islam had treated Roman literature as unreligious and unworthy. It could have been shut down if the Christian world had not obtained the scientific knowledge of the Islamic world. If the Protestant Reformation was not underway, there would have been no safe haven for scientists after the Catholic church crackdown.
There could be intelligent communities on other planets, just without the technology to communicate with us or to visit. On the whole, we must agree with one scientific assessment that the number of intelligent civilizations in the universe with advanced technology is a maximum of two civilizations per galaxy to as few as one per four galaxies.
Planets with intelligent life are exceedingly rare and far away. This is the real reason we have had no visitors from outer space. For more on the topic of space travel to other planets, see Is Human Existence Ultimately Futile?